Click to Access 
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4
Table 1

The data in this chart is taken from the templates submitted by the first cohort of M.Ed. students to use the template. It demonstrates the type of evidence they used to document whether or not they were able to meet a profile set by ISTE. The focus for research for the next cohort will be one of qualitative study on the narrative portions of the template and how they connect their evidence to their narrative.
 
ISTE PPI
WebSites
Documents
Excel Charts
Presentations
Other
Technology
Operations &
Concepts
19
1
1
1
18
Planning &
Designing
Learning
Environments
& Experiences
40
22
2
71
3
Teaching,
Learning, &
the Curriculum
48
11
--
1
--
Assessment &
Evaluation
48
--
--
20
10
Productivity &
Professional
Practice
20
4
2
14
--
Social, Ethical, 
Legal, &
Human Issues
92
--
--
2
2
Total
267
38
5
109
33
Percentage
59
9
1
24
7
 

Table 2

The data in this table illustrates the students' self-evaluation on issues of competence regarding the use of technology. Students choose three technology skills/applications in which they feel they need more help and three technology skills/applications with which they feel most comfortable.


Technology skills/applications
with which students feel
they need more help
Technology skills/applications
with which students feel
most comfortable
Skills/
Applications
% of students
Rank
% of students
Skills/
Applications
Database
55
1
85
PowerPoint
Spreadsheet
40
2
65
Word Processing
& Internet
Dissecting
Microscope
30
3
45
Digital
Camera
FlexCam
25
4
25
Flatbed
Scanner
Multimedia
Projector &
Hardware Set Up
20
5
15
Digital
Video
Camera
 
Table 3

The data in this table represents the technologies they are most likely to use in the classroom (self-reported). Students were asked to rank order the items with a ranking of 1 as most-likely. This is the combined ranking of 20 students from the first cohort to take the technology teaching lab courses and to use the template.
 
Hardware
Raw Score*
Rank
Raw Score*
Software
Digital
Camera
26
1
22
Word Processing
Flatbed
Scanner
57
2
43
Internet
Digital
Video Camera
64
3
75
PowerPoint
FlexCam
71
4
83
HyperStudio
Multimedia
Projector
94
5
93
Educational
Programs
Dissecting
Microscope
100
6
104
Spreadsheet
Digital
Balance
113
7
111
Database

 
Table 4

The data in this table represents the students' perceptions of their learning during the technology teaching lab courses and in their field placements. This was a Likert scale survey with each question assigned a ranking from 5 (excellent) to 1 (poor).
 
Item
n
X
Med
SD
How well prepared do you feel to incorporate technology into Science lessons?
 20 
 4.4 
 4.5 
 0.66 
How well prepared do you feel to incorporate technology into Language Arts lessons?
20
4.1
4.0
0.65
How well prepared do you feel to incorporate technology into your lessons in general?
20
3.95
4.0
1.07
Access to technology at this regional campus?
20
3.857
4.0
0.71
How well did your technology experience connect with your methods classes?
20
3.7
4.0
1.06
How well prepared do you feel to incorporate technology into Mathematics lessons?
20
3.67
4.0
0.56
How well did your technology experiences support your overall effort in your classes?
20
3.65
4.0
1.06
Access to technology at field placement 1 (Suburban district)?
20
3.55
4.0
0.92
Access to technology at field placement 1 (Rural district)?
20
3.45
4.0
0.92
How well did your technology experience contribute to general lesson planning?
20
3.45
4.0
1.07
How well prepared do you feel to incorporate technology into Social Studies lessons?
20
3.368
3.0
0.93

 
Program
Overview
General
Preparation
Professional
Preparation
Student Teaching
Preparation
First Year Teaching
Preparation
Integrated
Teaching & Learning
 
Site Designed and Developed 
Center for Instructional Design & Development
The Ohio State University
by Danilo M. Baylen
Technology Services @ Mansfield Campus
Last Update on December 5, 2001